Monday 16 November 2009

SKINHEADS

What is the first thing that comes to mind when thinking about ‘skinhead’ ? Racism? Nazism? Fascism? Hatred and violence ? Unfortunately, these seems to be quite natural nowadays for most of us. Due to so powerful today’s media, people have been already familiarized with such a view.  A fake one.

Writing this entry I’d like to present the real image of a ‘traditional’ skinhead. I’ll describe the origins of the subculture and why it has been so badly understood.

HISTORY

A traditional skinhead finds his origins in so-called mods and rude boys. Mods was the name of a youth subculture in the United Kingdom during late 50s. After the Second World War, the Britain’s economic boom led to an increase of money possessed by young Brits. Some of them spent it mostly on fashionable clothes popularized by American soul groups, British R&B bands and some movie actors. These young people were so noticeable that they started to create a subculture among British society - a subculture called Mods. They were mostly associated with their devotion to fashion, music (ska,  rocksteady) and scooters (mainly Vespa). Mods could be divided into two groups: smooth mods (also known as peacock mods) who were less violent and usually wore the most expensive clothes and hard mods (also known as gang mods) that could be identified by their shorter hair and more British working-class image. Hard mods, because of their short hair, started to be called skinheads about 1968. Another influence on the British youth came from Jamaica. During 60’s many young people who emigrated to the United Kingdom represented another subculture, called rude boys. These were Jamaican hooligans who copied the style of gangsters from 50’s by wearing suits and hats to be more elegant. Both these groups, British mods and Jamaican rude boys, influencing each other formed a new subculture called skinheads  (remember, both white and black races contributed).



THE FUSION

Traditional skinheads inherited from mods a tradition of driving Vespa scooters and elegant, minimalistic way of clothing (Levi’s trousers, polo shirts, checked shirts, Harrington-type jackets). They were also more into ska music and interested in Jamaican reggae further known as skinhead reggae (2 Tone). 

Skinhead reggae:

The most intensive evolution of this subculture is dated for 1969. However, it didn’t last for long as with the hippie youth movement propagated by The Beatles it almost disappeared after two years.


REBIRTH OF SUBCULTURE (SECOND WAVE)

In the mid 70’s the skinhead subculture started to be visible again. It was a natural reaction for a punk subculture which was associated with putridity, dirt and stinkpots. Opposite to that, skinheads represented cleanness, discipline and strong characters. The only thing that 70’s skinheads inherited from the punk subculture was the strong negation of the surrounding reality in the social meaning. They also totally resigned from Jamaican elements replacing them with those from punk rock. The new subculture, named by the British press as punk skins, started to grow mostly among the aggressive pseudo football fans. Many of those who represented the new subculture supported the far right National Front political party which propagated anti-migration racism. National Front members formed groups which were to attack many representatives of ethnic minorities in Great Britain in the late 70’s. These members, having nothing in common with traditional skinheads, started to copy their style (minimalistic clothing, short hair) which soon led to unfair and wrong identification of both as one and the same by the British press. The second wave of a skinhead subculture was not a pure British phenomenon. It has been associated mainly with nazi-racist ideologies and was propagated by neo-fascist political parties in America, Germany and France.


Sadly, neo-nazists do not have so simple lives:



THE THIRD WAVE

'IF YOU ARE A RACIST YOU CAN’T BE A SKINHEAD!'



Along with the existing racist form of skinheads in 80’s and 90’s the new, third wave (known also as third wave ska) started to appear. Fortunately, most of the third wave groups referred to origins of the primary skinhead subculture. We can observe many new variants of this subculture, making an opposition to neo-nazists, for example such groups like SHARP (Skinheads Against Racist Prejudice) in New York, Anti-Racist Action in England or Red and Anarchist Skinheads (RASH). All of them wanted to change the image and general opinion on the whole subculture.


SUMMARY

Skinhead subculture exists almost in every European country (mainly in Russia and Germany) as well as in Japan, Brazil, USA and Canada. Nowadays the skinhead subculture takes all possible forms, from nationalist, neo-nazi-fascist, totally apolitical (Oi!), those referring to the origins of the ska music, to far left.



We have to remember that talking about real skinheads we should also take Afro-Americans into consideration. Let’s just take a look at one of the most famous and influential ska bands in the history – The Specials or Mr. Symarip:


The Specilas – Gangsters


The Specials – Skinhead Moonstomp



Mr Symarip – Skinheads Dem a Come


At the end, I’d like to recommend two movies for those who were interested by the subject:


‘This is England’ - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/This_Is_England



‘Skinhead attitude’ – a documentary available on youtube in 9 parts starting here (it is in polish but the best quality version on YT)

 

What do you think about this subculture ? Has your opinion changed ? Do you find any sense in creating any subculture ?


11 comments:

  1. I'll start with the last of your questions- subculture is something that gives people identity and the sense of belonging. We need it like a faith, so I find some sense, though I don't belong to any subculture.
    What you wrote isn't anything new for me. There is one thing in which I can not agree with you- you wrote that people have fake view on skinheads because of media. I think that not only "people" don't know anything about skinheads background, but also skinheads themselves (not everyone of course). Like you said, the second wave skinheads were, in the great majority, people, who didn't have much in common with the traditional ones. But it's not the media fault that they gave the skinhead subculture such a bad name. On one SHARP on the street falls three facists or racists calling themeselves a skinheads, no wonder why people don't sympathize with this subculture.

    ReplyDelete
  2. You're right. Even recently I've seen a TV programme devoted to some gangs in different countries. Last time they visited Poland and met some of so-called skinheads. Actually, these guys were calling skinheads themselves (of course being a neo-nazi idiots) and when asked why they don't tolerate any other race they just cited some kind of wikipedia or other already written formulas not even knowing what they were talking about. This is really ridiculous and stupid but what can we do about this? However, I still think that the most fault can be found in media as they seem to be most influential nowadays. It's them who create public opinion, right ?

    ReplyDelete
  3. I have bad opinion about skinheads not because of tv programmes but because I have some bad experience.
    Ok, I know they're not "true" skinheads, but it's like the emo subculture nowadays. They're not "true" and "original" either, but still they call themselves emo, and people do the same. So when my friend had his nose broken at the concert, he told us he was beaten by skinheads, not by shaved, young, agressive men in boots and flyer's jackets ;)

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think that there is a huge difference between skinheads in USA and equivalent of this subculture in Poland. In my opinion in Poland those people are usually connected with hooligans. We can hear frequently about devastating public places by group of "bold people". Often people connect them with football fans or just group of aggresive people. In the Poland we can't meet subculture which is counterpart to american skinheads. I think that there is notinhg wrong in creating a subculture when it's just to unite people with the same opinions. For me Emo is very controvercial. What normal people cut their vain just to be "nice" ?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Krzysztof, there is big difference in "bold people" and skinheads. I know some skinheads from Milanowek city (near Warsaw), some of them study, some of them work. In general, they are intelligent people, but some of them are agressive.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Good job on getting into the historical details Blazej. I myself did not know all about it, even though I had examined the history of skinhead subculture in the past. As we have already discussed this matter quite a few times, I must agree that skinheads in Poland have no clue about origins of the subculture. On the other hand, I wonder how many people who call themselves skinheads are there in Poland? Anyone got numbers? :)

    Unfortunately, word skinhead in Polish dictionary for most people is a synonym of hatred towards minorities. And that's just sad.

    ReplyDelete
  7. There is a lot of controversy about skinheads. Too many I think. Currently, this is just a group of people that have too much free time and energy I suppose.

    I just can't imagine me wasting my time for shady activities including beating niggah, Jews and from time to time gays. And of course shaving my head every bloody morning... ;)

    In my opinion skinheads should focus on improving light side of their existence as knowledge, professional skills and another hobbys.

    ReplyDelete
  8. When i was young i was a member of "Metalowcy" (i don't know English equivalent for this word) in Piaseczno near Warsaw. Thing that i remember from that period about skinheads is that they always attack me and my friends at streets and metal music concerts because the didn't like out long hairs ... c'mon how stupid that was - beat 15-16 years boys. On the other hand i must say that informations you collected here are quite interesting. Its sad how some people can misunderstood ideology of their subculture.

    ReplyDelete
  9. In my opinion:
    Skinhead ska - Yes
    Skinhead neo-nazi - NO!!!
    I think I dont must to explain why..

    ReplyDelete
  10. Sometimes it is fun becoming a member of some kind of a group and sticking together. I experienced it on my own skin when I was going to a lot of concerts. Nowadays I don't have too much time for that. Most of the skinheads I have met weren't too nice so I don't like them very much, but I'm sure there are some nicer people in this subculter too. As they say you cannot judge a book by its cover.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Very interesting. I think also skinheads are much more divided into groups. Most of them are intelligent and educated, and just express they way like other groups.But there are some that spoils this by separating each other in some dangerous groups like nazi-skinheads.

    ReplyDelete